Answer:
I'd say there are two really important parts: Integrity and Impartiality. By 'Integrity', I mean integrity of the data collected for an enquiry. The Digital Forensic examiner has a duty to make sure that any data that may be used in evidence has not been changed or altered in any way. By 'Impartiality', I mean that the Digital Forensic examiner should carry out analysis with an open mind. It is not the place of the Digital Forensic examiner to decide whether someone is 'guilty' or 'innocent' of doing some deed on a digital device. Where an enquiry leads to court proceedings, that is for the court to decide. The Digital Forensic examiner's job is to try to establish what happened, when, in other words, to unravel the sequence of events that occurred during the time period under review. With digital devices, it is virtually impossible to say whose hands were on the keyboard at any given time. There are likely to be clues that point to the involvement of a particular person or persons, though, and the Digital Forensic examiner should gather as many of these clues as possible and report them, in an unbiased way, to whoever is leading the inquiry.